138.88.43.77

September 2024

Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Watergate salad have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Nobody (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hotdish. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 01:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:PEPSI697. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Knitsey (talk) 03:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Talk:Smiley. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Z. Patterson (talk) 17:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary to articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to discuss the article, please use the article's talk page. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 19:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I made a comment on the talk page, which was deleted immediately after I made it. 138.88.43.77 (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I was referring to this edit. ... discospinster _talk 00:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

By Z. Patterson. You can look above and see what he did. He removed my absolutely substantive comment, aimed at improvement of the article, from Talk:Smiley. This is unconscionable. 138.88.43.77 (talk) 19:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

This is what he said: "I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Talk:Smiley. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page." I did make it on the "article's accompanying talk page" (Talk:Smiley), and this was admitted in the same sentence of his. 138.88.43.77 (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Interestingly, the following comment was never removed from "Talk:Smiley" by any editor: "Dinosaurs

[edit]

dinosaurs died about 2 million years ago !" 138.88.43.77 (talk) 19:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

---